Pros and Cons of Foundation and Bootstrap

Foundation and Bootstrap

In the dynamic realm of web development, the need for responsive, mobile-first websites has never been greater. Front-end frameworks have become essential tools for developers seeking to meet this demand efficiently. Bootstrap and Foundation are two of the leading frameworks that have emerged as the go-to solutions for building responsive designs. Both frameworks offer a robust set of features, but they also have their unique characteristics, advantages, and limitations.

This article delves into what Bootstrap and Foundation are, their key differences, and the pros and cons of each. This will help developers and organizations make informed decisions about which framework to adopt for their projects.

What is Bootstrap?

Bootstrap, first launched in 2011 by Twitter, is an open-source front-end framework meticulously crafted for creating websites that are both responsive and mobile-first. Its purpose is to provide developers with a powerful toolset to enhance the quality, versatility, and user experience of their web projects. It provides a comprehensive selection of pre-styled components, JavaScript plugins, and a grid system that enables developers to prototype and build user interfaces rapidly. Bootstrap’s popularity stems from its ease of use, extensive documentation, and a large community of users.

What is Foundation?

Foundation, created by ZURB, is a leading responsive front-end framework renowned for incorporating best practices for using Foundation into its flexible, semantic approach to design and development. Launched in 2011, it caters to professional developers who desire more control over their code and design elements. By prioritizing modularity, Foundation allows for selective use of its components, enabling developers to tailor the framework to their specific needs for a highly customizable experience.

Bootstrap vs Foundation Comparison

1. Styles

Bootstrap often imposes its own style-centric class names, which may result in a distinct “Bootstrap look” if not heavily customized.

Foundation provides a more minimalistic approach to styling, which can be advantageous for developers looking for a barebones structure to style upon.

2. CSS Preprocessors

Bootstrap was originally built with Less but has moved to Sass from version 4 onwards, embracing the more commonly used preprocessor in the developer community.

Foundation is built primarily with Sass, providing a rich set of mixins and functions that encourage a more programmatic approach to styling.

3. Grid

Bootstrap’s grid system is based on a 12-column system and offers both fixed-width and fluid-width layouts, using a series of containers, rows, and columns.

Foundation’s grid is also a 12-column system but includes a more flexible and advanced XY grid system that allows for nested grids and horizontal and vertical cell alignment.

4. Units of Measure

Bootstrap utilizes rems, ems, and pixels for its typography, spacing, and component sizing, which allows for better scalability and responsiveness.

Foundation uses rems for its grid system, spacing, and typography, aiming for high consistency across different browsers and devices with relative units.

5. Browser Compatibility

Bootstrap aims to support all major browsers and includes specific fixes to handle cross-browser inconsistencies, often supporting the last two versions of major browsers including IE.

Foundation targets modern browsers and is often quicker to deprecate support for older versions, focusing on cutting-edge technologies and pushing for standards compliance.

6. Unique Features

Bootstrap includes a set of JQuery-based JavaScript plugins that provide functionality for components like carousels, modals, and tooltips.

Foundation is known for its unique features like the Interchange plugin for responsive content, Off-Canvas for creating slide-in panels, and the Equalizer for equal-height elements.

7. Community and Support

Bootstrap has a massive community following, with numerous contributors, extensive forums, and third-party resources that offer added support and extensions.

Foundation’s community, while smaller, is made up of professional developers and tends to be focused on more advanced web development topics. Despite its size, the community actively contributes to Foundation’s development and provides support through forums and documentation.

Pros and Cons of Bootstrap


1. Fewer Cross-Browser Bugs: Bootstrap provides a consistent framework that supports the majority of browsers and comes with CSS compatibility fixes, which reduces the time spent on fixing cross-browser issues making it one of the most crucial Bootstrap benefits for web development.

2. Lightweight and Customizable: Despite offering a range of features, Bootstrap customization and flexibility allows only what is needed, keeping the file size down and improving performance.

3. Responsive Structures and Styles: With its mobile-first approach, Bootstrap’s grid system and responsive utilities make it straightforward to create a site that works on all devices.

4. JavaScript Plugins: Bootstrap includes a variety of JavaScript plugins via jQuery, offering dynamic components such as modals, dropdowns, and transitions that enhance user interfaces.

5. Documentation and Community Support: With comprehensive documentation and a large community, Bootstrap provides extensive support, making it easier for developers to learn and solve issues.

6. Templates and Themes: There are numerous free and professional templates, WordPress themes, and plugins available for Bootstrap, giving developers a head start on projects.

7. Great Grid System: Bootstrap’s grid system is renowned for its simplicity and effectiveness, enabling developers to create complex layouts with ease.


1. Similarity in Design: Bootstrap’s popularity has led to a plethora of websites with a similar look and feel, which can be seen as a lack of creativity or uniqueness.

2. Heavy File Size: The framework includes a comprehensive set of features, which can result in a larger file size and potentially impact the website’s load time.

3. Overreliance on jQuery: Bootstrap’s JavaScript components are largely dependent on jQuery, which due to being one of the most common libraries leaves most of the plugins unused making it one of the limitations of Bootstrap framework.

4. Verbose Styles: Bootstrap's class-based styling approach can lead to verbose HTML, with many class names required to achieve the desired layout and styling. This can result in bloated HTML output that includes classes and elements that are not necessary, complicating the code and potentially impacting performance.

5. Non-compliant HTML: Some of Bootstrap’s components or practices might encourage the use of non-semantic HTML. This could potentially lead to accessibility issues and make the HTML structure harder to maintain or scale.

Pros and Cons of Foundation


1. Unique Design Potential: Foundation doesn't impose as much design flavor as other frameworks, making it easier to create a unique look. Its flat design is modern and can be used effectively without extensive customization.

2. CSS Efficiency: One of the advantages of using Foundation framework is that it is designed to produce minimal CSS bloat. Its base CSS has built-in appearances that create a clean look with less redundant code within the HTML.

3. Flexible Grids: The grid system in Foundation is highly versatile, featuring flexible grids with centered columns, easy column collapsing, and block grid capabilities that simplify the creation of equal-width columns.

4. Widgets and Interactivity:

  • Foundation framework features and tools include a native HTML5 form validation library, enhancing user experience and form handling.
  • Navigation can be tucked away to the side, providing a sleek and unobtrusive user interface.
  • It offers a pricing table widget that's ideal for subscription-based product listings.
  • The framework's interchange feature loads appropriate media for different devices or screen sizes, aiding in the optimization of content delivery.
  • It supports multilingual websites, including languages that are read from right to left, making it more versatile on a global scale.
  • The "joyride" feature in Foundation is designed for site tours, enhancing user onboarding and engagement.

5. Additional Services:

  • The Foundation team extends its support beyond the framework itself by offering professional services and courses.
  • A variety of online training courses for Foundation and other web technologies are available, providing developers with opportunities for growth and learning.


1. Complexity for Beginners: Foundation’s advanced features and less opinionated structure may pose a challenge for less experienced developers.

2. Smaller Community: Compared to Bootstrap, Foundation has a smaller community, which can make it harder to find support and resources.

3. Less Frequent Updates: The development cycle for Foundation is not as rapid as Bootstrap, which might be a concern for developers looking for constant improvements.

4. Learning Curve for Advanced Features: While Foundation provides more control, its advanced features, like the XY grid and interchange, have a steeper learning curve.

5. Drawbacks of Foundation for Responsive Design: While Foundation is highly flexible, it can be more complex to use effectively for responsive design, particularly for those who are not well-versed in advanced CSS and layout techniques.
6. Bootstrap vs Foundation for mobile responsiveness: Bootstrap is often praised for its out-of-the-box mobile responsiveness, with a grid system and components that are designed to look and work well on mobile devices by default. Foundation also offers responsive design capabilities, but it may require more fine-tuning and a deeper understanding of the framework to achieve the same level of mobile optimization.

When to Choose Bootstrap

Bootstrap is an ideal choice for developers and companies that require rapid prototyping and development, robust documentation, and community support and do not require highly unique design elements. It is particularly beneficial for small to medium-sized projects, startups, and those new to front-end development due to its ease of use and extensive resources.

When to Choose Foundation

Foundation is better suited for projects that require a higher degree of customization and complex layout designs. It is the preferred choice for experienced developers who value semantic markup and a professional-grade framework that can be tailored to precise specifications. Features such as blockgrid and joyride and very handy in tailoring such precise designs according to your needs. Large-scale projects, enterprise applications, and web properties that aim to stand out with a distinctive design often lean towards Foundation.


Both Bootstrap and Foundation performance benchmarks offer compelling features for front-end development, but their suitability depends on the specific needs, skills, and goals of the developers and organizations using them. Bootstrap’s user-friendly approach, comprehensive components, and extensive community make it an attractive option for many projects. At the same time, Foundation’s flexibility, customization capabilities, and professional focus cater to a more specialized audience looking for granular control over their design and development process.

Ultimately, the decision to use Bootstrap or Foundation should be informed by the project requirements, the desired level of uniqueness in design, the development team’s expertise, and the long-term maintenance considerations. By carefully weighing the pros and cons of each framework, developers can select the most appropriate tool that aligns with their vision and objectives, ensuring the creation of responsive, accessible, and effective websites.

Frequently Asked Questions

Get great articles direct to your inbox

The latest Resourcequeue news, articles, and resources, sent straight to your inbox every month.